At the moment, my main activity is uploading my collection of photographs to this and other sites.
This turns out to be more work than one might think. Probably most of that is due to poor planning on my part back when I was first taking the photographs, or first scanning them in.
I have a fair number of photos that I have either uploaded to my main site www.kgphoto.biz or to Flickr (architectural details, for review by collaborators), or to pages on my personal web site (for consumption by family, friends, and colleagues). I likewise have a fair number of photos that I have circulated in study groups and entered into exhibitions.
Now, however, I want to start publishing them, both online and, well, offline -- stores, galleries, exhibitions, etc.
I find that, because of the differing requirements of all the previous 'audiences', the files thus uploaded or submitted have strange file names, and are mostly in smaller sizes and at lower resolutions than will readily reproduced at larger than greeting-card sizes.
Also, extremely few (if any) have metadata in them, even simple copyright notices, let alone keywords, location tags, captions, comments, and so forth.
For a variety of reasons, it has turned out to be relatively difficult, or at least tedious, tracking down the "originals" of these image files. In many cases, this is because the intended recipient required files to be named using their own format, not the name generated by the camera. In the case of scanned images, of course, there *was* no convention.
So, now I'm hard at work, ferreting out the "originals" of the images in my "canon", and the largest, highest-resolution versions thereof, and converting them to formats suitable for the various labs and services I intend to use.
And adding metadata. That has been an adventure all by itself. But I'll leave that to another entry.